Résumé
In SVARs, identification of structural shocks can be subject to nonfundamentalness, as the econometrician may have an information set smaller than the economic agents’ one. How serious is that problem from a quantitative point of view? In this paper we propose a simple diagnostic for the quantitative importance of nonfundamentalness in structural VARs. The diagnostic is of interest as nonfundamentalness is not an either/or question, and its quantitative implications can be more or less severe. As an illustration, we apply our diagnostic to the identification of TFP news shocks and we find that nonfundamentalness is of little quantitatively importance in that context.
Mots-clés
NonFundamentalness; Business Cycles; SVARs; News Shocks.;
Codes JEL
- C32: Time-Series Models • Dynamic Quantile Regressions • Dynamic Treatment Effect Models • Diffusion Processes
- E32: Business Fluctuations • Cycles
Remplace
Paul Beaudry, Patrick Fève, Alain Guay et Franck Portier, « When is Nonfundamentalness in SVARs A Real Problem? », TSE Working Paper, n° 16-738, novembre 2016.
Référence
Paul Beaudry, Patrick Fève, Alain Guay et Franck Portier, « When is Nonfundamentalness in SVARs A Real Problem? », Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 34, octobre 2019, p. 221–243.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 34, octobre 2019, p. 221–243