Résumé
The tax regimes applied to couples in many countries including the US, France, and Germany imply either a marriage penalty or a marriage bonus. We study how they affect the decision to get married by considering two potential spouses who play a marriage proposal game. At the end of the game they may get married, live together without formal marriage, or split up. Proposing (or getting married) implies a cost that can indicate strong love. The striking property we obtain is that a marriage bonus may actually reduce the probability that a couple gets married. If the bonus is sufficiently large, signaling is no longer informative, and a pooling equilibrium in which no couples get married remains. Similarly, a marriage penalty may increase marriages. The penalty may lead to a separating equilibrium with efficiency enhancing information transmission, which was otherwise not possible.
Mots-clés
Marriage penalty; Marriage bonus; Proposal game; Signaling;
Codes JEL
- H82: Governmental Property
- J12: Marriage • Marital Dissolution • Family Structure • Domestic Abuse
- H31: Household
Remplace
Francesca Barigozzi, Helmuth Cremer et Kerstin Roeder, « Until taxes do us part: tax penalties or bonuses and the marriage decision », TSE Working Paper, n° 17-858, novembre 2017.
Référence
Francesca Barigozzi, Helmuth Cremer et Kerstin Roeder, « Till taxes do us part: tax penalties or bonuses and the marriage decision », European Economic Review, vol. 118, septembre 2019, p. 37–50.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
European Economic Review, vol. 118, septembre 2019, p. 37–50