Résumé
We study the demand for actuarially fair Long Term Care (LTC hereafter) insurance in a setting where autonomous agents only care for daily life consumption while dependent agents also care for LTC expenditures. We assume that dependency decreases the marginal utility of daily life consumption. We rst obtain that some agents optimally choose not to insure themselves, while no agent wishes to buy complete insurance. We then show that the comparison of marginal utility of income (as opposed to consumption) across health states depends on (i) whether agents do buy LTC insurance at equilibrium or not, (ii) the comparison of the degree of risk aversion for consumption and for LTC expenditures, and (iii) the income level of agents. Our results then oer testable implications that can explain (i) why few people buy Long Term Care insurance and (ii) the discrepancies between various empirical works when measuring the extent of state-dependent preferences for LTC.
Mots-clés
Long Term Care Insurance Puzzle; Actuarially Fair Insurance; Risk Aversion;
Codes JEL
- D11: Consumer Economics: Theory
- I13: Health Insurance, Public and Private
Remplacé par
Philippe De Donder et Marie-Louise Leroux, « Long Term Care Insurance with State-Dependent Preferences », Health Economics, septembre 2021.
Référence
Philippe De Donder et Marie-Louise Leroux, « Long Term Care Insurance with State-Dependent Preferences », TSE Working Paper, n° 19-1061, décembre 2019, révision août 2021.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
TSE Working Paper, n° 19-1061, décembre 2019, révision août 2021