Résumé
The paper investigates socially responsible investment (SRI) when savers’ moral compass is direct consequentialism. It unveils the determinants of the (positive) green premium under laissez-faire and studies the ability of Pigouvian taxes to deliver the first-best outcome. It characterizes conditions under which, despite leakage, divestment increases social welfare. It describes when best-in-class strategies dominate exclusion. It further demonstrates that, whenever a polluting technology may be cleaned, shareholder activism in the polluting sector may be the morally right action. The paper then conducts the same analysis with two other moral criteria: "shared responsibility" and rule consequentialism, and compares their implications to the ones of direct consequentialism.
Mots-clés
socially responsible investment; consequentialism; impact investing; green premium; Pigou tax; divestment, shareholder activism;
Codes JEL
- A13: Relation of Economics to Social Values
- D62: Externalities
- H23: Externalities • Redistributive Effects • Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
- Q59: Other
Référence
Paul-Henri Moisson, « Social Responsibility, Consequentialism and Public Policy », TSE Working Paper, n° 24-1521, mars 2024.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
TSE Working Paper, n° 24-1521, mars 2024