Résumé
Power market integration is analyzed in a two-country model with nationally regulated firms and costly public funds. If the generation costs between the two countries are too similar, negative business stealing outweighs efficiency gains so that, subsequent to integration, welfare decreases in both regions. Integration is welfare enhancing when the cost difference between two regions is large enough. The benefits from export profits increase the total welfare in the exporting country, whereas the importing country benefits from a lower price. In this case, market integration also improves incentives to invest compared to autarky. The investment levels remain inefficient, however, especially for transportation facilities. Free riding reduces incentives to invest in these public-good components of the network, whereas business stealing tends to decrease the capacity to finance new investment.
Codes JEL
- F12: Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies • Fragmentation
- F15: Economic Integration
- L43: Legal Monopolies and Regulation or Deregulation
- L51: Economics of Regulation
- R53: Public Facility Location Analysis • Public Investment and Capital Stock
Remplace
Emmanuelle Auriol et Sara Biancini, « Economic Integration and Investment Incentives in Regulated Industries », TSE Working Paper, n° 09-039, mai 2009.
Référence
Emmanuelle Auriol et Sara Biancini, « Powering Up Developing Countries through Economic Integration », The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 29, n° 1, 2015, p. 1–40.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 29, n° 1, 2015, p. 1–40