Résumé
We revisit the group size paradox in a model where two groups of different sizes compete for a prize exhibiting a varying degree of rivalry and where group effort is given by a CES function of individual e¤orts. We show that the larger group can be more successful than the smaller group if the degree of complementarity is sufficiently high relative to the degree of rivalry of the prize.
Mots-clés
group size paradox; group contest; complementarity; (impure) public good;
Codes JEL
- D72: Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- D74: Conflict • Conflict Resolution • Alliances
Remplace
Guillaume Cheikbossian et Romain Fayat, « Group Size, Collective Action and Complementarities in Efforts », TSE Working Paper, n° 18-918, mai 2018.
Référence
Guillaume Cheikbossian et Romain Fayat, « Collective Action, Group Size and Complementarities in Efforts », Economics Letters, vol. 168, juillet 2018, p. 77–81.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
Economics Letters, vol. 168, juillet 2018, p. 77–81