Résumé
We investigate how platform market power affects platforms' design choices in ad-funded two-sided markets, where platforms may find it optimal to charge zero price on the consumer side and extract surplus on the advertising side. We consider design choices affecting both sides in opposite ways and compare private incentives with social incentives. Platforms' design biases depend crucially on whether they can charge any price on the consumer side. We apply the framework to technology adoption, privacy, and ad load choices. Our results provide a rationale for a tougher competition policy to curb market power of ad-funded platforms with free services.
Codes JEL
- D4: Market Structure and Pricing
- L1: Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
- L5: Regulation and Industrial Policy
Remplacé par
Jay Pil Choi et Doh-Shin Jeon, « Platform Design Biases in Two-Sided Markets », TSE Working Paper, n° 20-1143, septembre 2020, révision février 2022.
Référence
Doh-Shin Jeon et Jay Pil Choi, « Platform Design Biases in Ad-Funded Two-Sided Markets », The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 54, n° 2, août 2023, p. 240–267.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 54, n° 2, août 2023, p. 240–267