Résumé
Firms sometimes comply with externality-correcting policies by gaming the measure that determines policy. This harms buyers by eroding information, but it benefits them when cost savings are passed through into prices. We develop a model that highlights this tension and use it to analyze gaming of automobile carbon emission ratings in the EU. We document startling increases in gaming using novel data. We then analyze the effects of gaming in calibrated simulations. Over a wide range of parameters, we find that pass through substantially outweighs information distortions; on net, buyers benefit from gaming, even when they are fooled by it.
Codes JEL
- Q5: Environmental Economics
- H2: Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
- L5: Regulation and Industrial Policy
Remplace
Mathias Reynaert et James M. Sallee, « Who Benefits When Firms Game Corrective Policies? », TSE Working Paper, n° 16-739, décembre 2016, révision août 2019.
Référence
Mathias Reynaert et James M. Sallee, « Who Benefits When Firms Game Corrective Policies? », American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol. 13, n° 1, février 2021, p. 372–412.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, vol. 13, n° 1, février 2021, p. 372–412