Résumé
We consider dynamic competition among platforms in a market with network externalities. A platform that dominated the market in the previous period be- comes \focal" in the current period, in that agents play the equilibrium in which they join the focal platform whenever such equilibrium exists. Yet when faced with higher-quality competition, can a low-quality platform remain focal? In the nite-horizon case, the unique equilibrium is ecient for \patient" platforms; with an innite time horizon, however, there are multiple equilibria where ei- ther the low- or high-quality platform dominates. If qualities are stochastic, the platform with a better average quality wins with a higher probability, even when its realized quality is lower, and this probability increases as platforms become more patient. Hence social welfare may decline as platforms become more forward looking.
Mots-clés
network externalities; dynamic competition; coordination;
Codes JEL
- L1: Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance
Remplacé par
Hanna Halaburda, Bruno Jullien et Yaron Yehezkel, « Dynamic competition with network externalities: how history matters », The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 51, mars 2020, p. 3–31.
Référence
Hanna Halaburda, Bruno Jullien et Yaron Yehezkel, « Dynamic Competition with Network Externalities: Why History Matters », TSE Working Paper, n° 16-636, mars 2016, révision juillet 2019.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
TSE Working Paper, n° 16-636, mars 2016, révision juillet 2019