Résumé
We show that every (random) assignment/allocation without transfers can be considered as a market outcome with personalized prices and an equal income. One can thus evaluate an assignment by investigating the prices and the induced opportunity sets. When prices are proportional across agents, the assignment is efficient; when prices are common, the assignment is both efficient and envy-free. Moreover, this market perspective reveals a weakness of envy-freeness.
Mots-clés
allocation without transfers; competitive equilibrium; equal incomes; market perspective; envy-free; Pareto efficient; coalitional-envy-free; random assignment;
Codes JEL
- C78: Bargaining Theory • Matching Theory
- D61: Allocative Efficiency • Cost–Benefit Analysis
- D63: Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
Remplacé par
Yinghua He, Sanxi Li et Jianye Yan, « Evaluating Assignment without Transfers: A Market Perspective », Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 133, 2015, p. 40–44.
Référence
Yinghua He, Sanxi Li et Jianye Yan, « Evaluating Assignment without Transfers: A Market Perspective », TSE Working Paper, n° 15-559, mars 2015.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
TSE Working Paper, n° 15-559, mars 2015