Résumé
How do individuals behave in a society that rewards "merit", despite not being all on the same starting line? Does inequality in head starts make meritocracy undesirable? Attempting to answer these questions, this paper develops a model of career concerns in which agents publicly choose among several activities in which to exert effort, and differ along a privately observable characteristic ("head start") that affects their performance. The agents’ audience values talent, effort and head start. We highlight two contrasting effects: a displacement effect by which the "poor" (head start-wise) try to avoid a lower talent image and thus avoid the activity chosen by the "rich", and a distinction effect by which the rich try to reap a higher head-start image and thus avoid the activity chosen by the poor. While displacement drags the poor towards activities with lower incentives on effort, distinction pulls the rich towards activities with higher incentives. Interpreting the model in terms of "meritocracy", we emphasize how the dominance of displacement or distinction can cause well-meaning policy interventions to backfire, and make meritocracy desirable or not.
Mots-clés
Meritocracy; inequality; image concerns; displacement; distinction;
Codes JEL
- D2: Production and Organizations
- D6: Welfare Economics
- H2: Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
- J24: Human Capital • Skills • Occupational Choice • Labor Productivity
- M5: Personnel Economics
Référence
Paul-Henri Moisson, « Meritocracy and Inequality », TSE Working Paper, n° 24-1518, mars 2024, révision avril 2024.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
TSE Working Paper, n° 24-1518, mars 2024, révision avril 2024