Résumé
Policies to incentivize the adoption of renewable energy sources (RES) usually offer little flexibility to adapt to heterogeneous benefits across locations. We evaluate the geographical misallocation of RES associated with the uniform nature of subsidies. We estimate the dispersion of marginal benefits from solar production in Germany and compute the social and private benefits from optimal reallocations of residential solar installations keeping total capacity fixed. We find that total value of solar would increase by 6.4% relative to the current allocation using conservative values for solar penetration. Reallocating all solar and taking into account transmission would yield considerably larger gains.
Mots-clés
Renewable energy sources; electricity markets; feed-in-tariffs; ancillary services; misallocation.;
Codes JEL
- H23: Externalities • Redistributive Effects • Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
- Q42: Alternative Energy Sources
- Q48: Government Policy
- Q51: Valuation of Environmental Effects
Remplacé par
Stefan Lamp et Mario Samano, « (Mis)allocation of Renewable Energy Sources », Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 10, n° 1, janvier 2023.
Référence
Stefan Lamp et Mario Samano, « (Mis)allocation of Renewable Energy Sources », TSE Working Paper, n° 20-1103, mai 2020, révision septembre 2020.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
TSE Working Paper, n° 20-1103, mai 2020, révision septembre 2020