Résumé
Procuring an innovation involves motivating a research effort to generate a new idea and then implementing that idea efficiently. If research efforts are unveriable and implementation costs are private information, a trade-off arises between the two objectives. The optimal mechanism resolves the trade-off via two instruments: a cash prize and a follow-on contract. It primarily uses the latter, by favoring the innovator at the implementation stage when the value of the innovation is above a certain threshold and handicapping the innovator when the value of the innovation is below that threshold. A cash prize is employed as a supplementary incentive only when the value of innovation is sufficiently high. These features are consistent with current practices in the procurement of innovation and the management of unsolicited proposals.
Mots-clés
Contract rights; Inducement Prizes; Innovation; Procurement and R&D;
Codes JEL
- D44: Auctions
- D82: Asymmetric and Private Information • Mechanism Design
- H57: Procurement
- O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
- O38: Government Policy
- O39: Other
Référence
Yeon-Koo Che, Elisabetta Iossa et Patrick Rey, « Prizes versus Contracts as Incentives for Innovation », TSE Working Paper, n° 16-695, septembre 2016, révision novembre 2020.
Voir aussi
Publié dans
TSE Working Paper, n° 16-695, septembre 2016, révision novembre 2020