Nash equilibria are extremely unstable in most games under the utility-taking gradient dynamics

Abstract

In the standard continuous-time choice-taking gradient dynamics in smooth two-player games, each player implicitly assumes that their opponent momentarily main-tains their last choice. Contrastingly, in the utility-taking gradient dynamics each player implicitly assumes that their opponent momentarily maintains their utility level, by marginally adjusting their choice to that effect. Somewhat surprisingly, employing a transversality argument we find that, in an open and dense set of smooth games, this dynamics is undefined at Nash equilibria. This occurs because, at a Nash equilibrium, the opponent’s indifference curve is not locally a function of one’s own strategy, mak-ing it impossible to specify an opponent’s adjustment that would maintain their utility in response to one’s own marginal deviation from Nash behavior. Furthermore, when approaching a Nash equilibrium of such a generic game, the utility-taking gradient dy-namics either accelerates without bound towards the equilibrium or diverges away from it with unbounded speed.

Keywords

Reference

Aviad Heifetz, and Jorge Peña, “Nash equilibria are extremely unstable in most games under the utility-taking gradient dynamics”, TSE Working Paper, n. 25-1627, March 2025.