Abstract
We study the dynamics of an innovative industry when agents learn about its strength, i.e., the likelihood that it gets hit by negative shocks. Managers can exert risk-prevention export to mitigate the consequences of such shocks. As time goes by, if no shock occurs, confidence improves. This attracts managers to the innovative sector. But, when confidence becomes high, less managers exerting low risk-prevention export also enter. This accelerates the growth of the industry, while inducing a decline in risk-prevention. The longer the boom, the stronger the confidence, the larger the losses if a shock occurs. While the above dynamics arise in the first best, with asymmetric information there is excessive entry of inefficient managers, earning informational rents at the expense of inneficient managers. This inflates the innovative sector and increases its vulnerability.
Replaces
Bruno Biais, Jean-Charles Rochet, and Paul Woolley, “The dynamics of innovation and risk”, TSE Working Paper, n. 13-448, October 2013.
Reference
Bruno Biais, Jean-Charles Rochet, and Paul Woolley, “The dynamics of innovation and risk”, The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 28, n. 5, 2015, pp. 1353–1380.
See also
Published in
The Review of Financial Studies, vol. 28, n. 5, 2015, pp. 1353–1380