Social preferences or sacred values? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations

Abstract

Recent advances in economic theory, largely motivated by experimental findings, have led to the adoption of models of human behavior where decision-makers take into consideration not only their own payoff but also others’ payoffs and any potential consequences of these payoffs. Investigations of deontological motivations, where decision-makers make their choice based on not only the consequences of a decision but also the decision per se, have been rare. We provide a formal interpretation of major moral philosophies and a revealed preference method to distinguish the presence of deontological motivations from a purely consequentialist decision-maker whose preferences satisfy first-order stochastic dominance.

Replaces

Daniel L. Chen, and Martin Schonger, “Social preferences or sacred values? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations”, TSE Working Paper, n. 16-714, October 2016, revised February 2020.

Reference

Daniel L. Chen, and Martin Schonger, “Social preferences or sacred values? Theory and evidence of deontological motivations”, Science Advances, vol. 8, n. 19, May 2022.