Abstract
A growing body of evidence suggests that individuals have time-inconsistent preferences. Even when they do not, policy makers who fear to loose elections will apply discount rates that decrease in relative time when they consider investment projects. To ináuence future choices, current strategic investments or investment subsidies should be larger for technologies that are strategic complements to future investments, further upstream in the supply chain, and characterized by longer maturity. A quantitative assessment suggests that time inconsistency can rationalize subsidies at similar levels as market failures such as externalities can. Furthermore, the two e§ects are superadditive: Time inconsistency and strategic investments are thus especially important for long-term policies associated with externalities.
Keywords
Time inconsistency; hyperbolic discounting; investment policy; production chain; green vs. brown technology; climate change.;
JEL codes
- D90: General
- H20: General
- O38: Government Policy
- Q50: General
Reference
Bård Harstad, “Technology and Time Inconsistency”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 128, n. 7, July 2020, pp. 2653–2689.
See also
Published in
Journal of Political Economy, vol. 128, n. 7, July 2020, pp. 2653–2689