Abstract
We study optimal income taxation in a two-group framework where the private cost of misreporting income is positively correlated with productivity. We show that, if high-wage types always reveal their income truthfully, letting low-wage types cheat would lead to Pareto-superior outcomes regardless of the audit costs (as compared to deterring them). When there is no cheating, redistribution takes place on first- or second-best frontiers with the low-wage types always ending up worse off than the high-wage types. Letting low-wage types conceal their income reduces the need to recourse to second-best mechanisms for redistribution. Additionally, it increases the reach of first-best redistribution to outcomes at which low-wage types are better off than high-wage types.
Keywords
Optimal taxation, tax evasion, audits, welfare-improving;
JEL codes
- H20: General
- H21: Efficiency • Optimal Taxation
- H26: Tax Evasion
Reference
Chiara Canta, Helmuth Cremer, and Firouz Gahvari, “Welfare-improving tax evasion”, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 126, n. 1, January 2024, pp. 98–126.
See also
Published in
The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 126, n. 1, January 2024, pp. 98–126