Article

Killer Acquisitions: Evidence from European Merger Cases

Marc Ivaldi, Nicolas Petit et Selçukhan Unekbas

Résumé

The killer acquisitions theory states that established firms buy new businesses to pre-empt future competition, particularly in the pharmaceutical and digital industries. The theory fuels demand to make merger policy more restrictive. • But is the theory of killer acquisitions supported by empirical facts? • Focusing on past investigations by the European Commission in information technology industries, this article studies whether acquisitions by large technology companies reduce competition by eliminating future rivalry. • Despite the small sample size, the findings suggest that none of the reviewed transaction was followed by the disappearance of the target’s products, a weakening of competing firms, and/or a post-merger lowering or absence of entry and innovation.

Mots-clés

killer acquisitions, case study, dynamic competition, innovation, mergers and acquisitions, nascent competitors;

Codes JEL

  • G34: Mergers • Acquisitions • Restructuring • Corporate Governance
  • L41: Monopolization • Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
  • L86: Information and Internet Services • Computer Software
  • O31: Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

Remplace

Marc Ivaldi, Nicolas Petit et Selçukhan Unekbas, « Killer Acquisitions: Evidence from EC Merger Cases in Digital Industries », TSE Working Paper, n° 23-1420, mars 2023, révision octobre 2024.

Référence

Marc Ivaldi, Nicolas Petit et Selçukhan Unekbas, « Killer Acquisitions: Evidence from European Merger Cases », Antitrust Law Journal, vol. 86-2, 2024, à paraître.

Voir aussi

Publié dans

Antitrust Law Journal, vol. 86-2, 2024, à paraître