Are geographical indications a worthy quality label? A framework with endogenous quality choice

Abstract

We analyze the effects of Geographical Indication (GI) labeling on quality choices and welfare with two vertically differentiated goods, one labelable, the other not. We consider two attributes of these goods: gustatory quality and geographical origin. We investigate two extreme cases of the Protected Designation of Origin (PDO) label: a denomination standard, which guarantees only the origin of the product, without any requirement on production specifications; and a minimum quality requirement, which guarantees both the origin and the quality of the product. We find that the PDO good is not necessarily the high-quality good. When it is, the introduction of the denomination standard causes its quality to decrease. Binding production specifications that maintain the quality level of the labeled good adversely affect the PDO firm.

JEL codes

Replaced by

Marion Desquilbet, and Sylvette Monier-Dilhan, “Are geographical indications a worthy quality label? A framework with endogenous quality choice”, European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 42, 2015, pp. 129–150.

Reference

Marion Desquilbet, and Sylvette Monier-Dilhan, “Are geographical indications a worthy quality label? A framework with endogenous quality choice”, TSE Working Paper, n. 11-263, December 2011, revised June 2012.