Abstract
While antitrust authorities strive to detect, prosecute, and thereby deter collusive conduct, entities harmed by that conduct are also advised to pursue their own strategies to deter collusion. The implications of such delegation of deterrence have largely been ignored, however. In a procurement context, we find that buyers may prefer to accommodate rather than deter collusion among their suppliers. We also show that a multi-market buyer, such as a centralized procurement authority, may optimally deter collusion when multiple independent buyers would not, consistent with the view that “large” buyers are less susceptible to collusion.
Keywords
Collusion; Cartel; Auction; Procurement; Reserves; Sustainability and initiation of collusion; Coordinated effects;
JEL codes
- D44: Auctions
- D82: Asymmetric and Private Information • Mechanism Design
- H57: Procurement
- L41: Monopolization • Horizontal Anticompetitive Practices
Reference
Elisabetta Iossa, Simon Loertscher, Leslie Marx, and Patrick Rey, “Coordination in the Fight Against Collusion”, TSE Working Paper, n. 23-1441, June 2023.
See also
Published in
TSE Working Paper, n. 23-1441, June 2023