Working paper

Estimating Social Preferences and Kantian Morality in Strategic Interactions

Boris Van Leeuwen, and Ingela Alger

Abstract

Theory suggests that a form of Kantian morality has evolutionary founda- tions. To investigate the relative importance of Kantian morality and social preferences, we run a laboratory experiment on strategic interaction in social dilemmas. We struc- turally estimate social preferences and Kantian morality at the individual and aggregate level. We observe considerable heterogeneity in preferences. Finite mixture analyses show that the subject pool is well described as consisting of two or three types: all display a Kantian moral concern, which they combine with aheadness aversion, behindness aver- sion, or both. The value of adding Kantian morality to well-established preference classes (distributional preferences as well as reciprocity) is also evaluated.

Keywords

social preferences; other-regarding preferences; Kantian morality, morality; experiment; structural estimation; finite mixture models;

JEL codes

  • C49: Other
  • C72: Noncooperative Games
  • C9: Design of Experiments
  • C91: Laboratory, Individual Behavior
  • D03: Behavioral Microeconomics • Underlying Principles
  • D84: Expectations • Speculations

Replaced by

Boris Van Leeuwen, and Ingela Alger, Estimating Social Preferences and Kantian Morality in Strategic Interactions, Journal of Political Economy Microeconomics, vol. 2, n. 4, November 2024.

Reference

Boris Van Leeuwen, and Ingela Alger, Estimating Social Preferences and Kantian Morality in Strategic Interactions, TSE Working Paper, n. 19-1056, November 2019, revised November 2023.

See also

Published in

TSE Working Paper, n. 19-1056, November 2019, revised November 2023