Abstract
This paper analyzes the regulation of payment schemes for health care providers competing in both quality and product differentiation of their services. The regulator uses two instruments: a prospective payment per patient and a cost reimbursement rate. When the regulator can only use a prospective payment, the optimal price involves a trade-off between the level of quality provision and the level of horizontal differentiation. If this pure prospective payment leads to underprovision of quality and overdifferentiation, a mixed reimbursement scheme allows the regulator to improve the allocation efficiency. This is true for a relatively low level of patients’transportation costs. We also show that if the regulator cannot commit to the level of the cost reimbursement rate, the resulting allocation can dominate the one with full commitment. In particular, some cost reimbursement might be optimal even for higher levels of transportation costs.
JEL codes
- I18: Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health
- L51: Economics of Regulation
Reference
David Bardey, Chiara Canta, and Jean-Marie Lozachmeur, “Health Care Providers Payments Regulation when Horizontal and Vertical Differentiation Matter”, TSE Working Paper, n. 10-164, March 2010.
See also
Published in
TSE Working Paper, n. 10-164, March 2010