Working paper

Perceived Ability and School Choices: Experimental Evidence and Scale-up Effects

Matteo Bobba, Veronica Frisancho, and Marco Pariguana

Abstract

This paper explores an information intervention designed and implemented within a school assignment mechanism in Mexico City. Through a randomized experiment, we show that providing a subset of applicants with feedback about their academic perfor-mance can enhance sorting by skill across high school tracks. This reallocation effect results in higher completion rates three years post-assignment. We further integrate the experimental evaluation into an empirical model of school choice and educational out-comes to assess the impact of the intervention for the overall population of applicants. Information provision is shown to increase the ex-ante efficiency of the student-school allocation, while congestion externalities are detrimental for the equity of education outcomes.

Keywords

Information; Subjective expectations; Beliefs updating; Biased beliefs; School choice; Discrete choice models; Control function; Stable matching;

JEL codes

  • D83: Search • Learning • Information and Knowledge • Communication • Belief
  • I21: Analysis of Education
  • I24: Education and Inequality
  • J24: Human Capital • Skills • Occupational Choice • Labor Productivity

Reference

Matteo Bobba, Veronica Frisancho, and Marco Pariguana, Perceived Ability and School Choices: Experimental Evidence and Scale-up Effects, TSE Working Paper, n. 16-660, June 2016, revised July 2024.

See also

Published in

TSE Working Paper, n. 16-660, June 2016, revised July 2024